Assessing the WNBA’s Worst Teams

Let’s take a look at the teams that were projected to be at the bottom of the standings heading into the season, and what we’ve learned so far. We’ll discuss how good we think they are (for sides betting purposes and general ball knowledge), along with where they may be most susceptible (for player props and daily fantasy).

Chicago Sky

The Sky carry the second-worst net rating on the season, and have particularly struggled to generate good looks on the offensive side of the ball. Their two-big lineups with Angel Reese at the power forward often lack the proper spacing to allow for clean drives to the paint. Their roster is also severely lacking in ball-handling. However, they have been much better of late. With Courtney Vandersloot out for the season and Kamilla Cardoso playing overseas, the Sky have deployed three shooters on the floor and Elizabeth Williams at the 5, who is a capable starter in her own right. Coincidentally or not, this period has overlapped with Reese’s best stretch of the season, increasing her efficiency while showing off her playmaking ability. Cardoso has rejoined the team, and it will be interesting to see if their improved play continues. The market is still pretty low on this team, but they have some underrated 3-and-D wings, and they could be undervalued if their frontcourt continues to be this effective. As far as matchups go, they are susceptible to the 3-pointer, allowing the most made threes in the league. However, their size and relentless offensive rebounding personnel make them a somewhat stingy matchup for opposing rebounds.

Conclusion: They’re pretty bad. They lack spacing and allow a ton of threes.

Connecticut Sun