Another year, another summer of best ball. It’s 2024 and with another year under our belts, we have more learnings we can apply to this year’s drafting strategies. Below is an evergreen article I previously wrote that still applies, with some additional updates based on how my thinking has evolved.
To kick the best-ball season off, I’ll start by giving my Five Keys to Winning at Best Ball:
1. Study the Structure, Format, and Scoring
Best ball is a game. And like any other game, it is important to ensure we understand the rules before playing. I say this not in jest but because ensuring we understand the rules and intricate details of each type of league or tournament provides us a leg up on our competition when drafting.
If we’re playing a tournament, we should consider whether it’s cumulative scoring or playoff style. What is necessary to advance each round, how many people do we need to beat each round, and most importantly, what is the construction of the final round? If the final round includes 539 people with a major percentage of the prize money at the top, we should focus on a more fragile but high-upside strategy that sets us up to succeed when our teams make it to the final week. If we are playing more cash style where the top three make money and payouts are generally flat, we should adjust our strategy to a potentially safer draft that can survive mid-round injuries (perhaps drafting three QBs or TEs). And just as important as the structure of the tournament or league is the scoring specifics.
Here are a few examples:
— Underdog:
.5 PPR, playoff style where you must advance out of your regular season group, through the multiple playoff weeks, culminating in a Week 17 championship. Best Ball Mania V requires finishing 2/12 in your drafting group, 1/13 in Week 15, 1/16 in Week 16, and a 539-team final group
— DraftKings:
Standard DK PPR scoring includes 100-yard rushing/receiving and 300-yard passing bonuses. Playoff style with 2/12 advancing from drafting group, 1/12 in Week 15, 1/16 in Week 16, and a 969-team final group
— Drafters:
Standard PPR scoring, cumulative scoring across full season (Weeks 1 – 17)
— FFPC:
Standard FFPC scoring including 1.5 ppr for TEs, 28-round drafts, and includes starting a kicker and defense
For more details on how to adjust for unique scoring formats, see Jack Miller’s evergreen content on the subject.
I highly recommend you use our rankings that are customized for each site. If you don’t see a certain site up there, see if that scoring format aligns with one of the other existing rankings. If not, feel free to reach out and we’ll see what we can do.
2. How To Stack Without Going Overboard
Stacking has become the norm in best-ball drafts, rightfully so. Not only is the correlation between the success of a QB and his pass catchers, but across a season, having more players on a high-scoring and efficient offense is generally a good thing. This year, the stacking strategy should be taken even a step further given the added importance of correlation in Week 17 (championship week!).
As the championship weeks across sites for best-ball tournaments grew from around 50 teams to a few hundred to even a thousand in some tournments, I started emphasizing the importance of building lineups that could excel in Week 17. This meant finding ways to have contrarian players, those in strong game environments, and most importantly, match-up stacks where you can hit the upside case of multiple players going off in a high-scoring game. Two years ago I was fortunate to capitalize on the latter in the DraftKings Main Event, hitting on a Joe Burrow – Ja’Marr Chase – Tee Higgins – Tyreek Hill – Darrel Williams stack. In a game the Bengals won 34-31, those five players combined for 141.54 points, or 62% of the 228.84 points that team scored to take fourth place (good for $200K). Predicting which players will be healthy and excel or which teams will have poor defenses is possible, but difficult and far from a guarantee. But through stacking a game, we can give ourselves the best chance at maximizing on the occasions a game turns into a blowout. And as was the case last year, having as many parts of the blowout gives you the best chance at beating the hundreds of others in the championship week.
But stacking isn’t limited to just Week 17 or merely traditional QB + pass catcher stacks. For example, with best ball being for the entire season, I actually expand my correlation to anyone on the team. Even two players you likely wouldn’t play together in DFS, such as Lamar Jackson and Derrick Henry, who negatively correlate in any given game, positively correlate across the season if the Ravens are an efficient and winning team. Both Jackson and Henry will likely have strong years if that is the case.
That is why when I think of stacking, I’m primarily considering how many players on the same team I can draft no matter the position. I’ll often even still stack 2-3 WRs and a TE or RB from a team even if I miss on drafting the QB. Because if that team has success, I can still make up the QB points elsewhere but capitalize on the correlated assets on that team.
The trick with stacking though is to not go overboard — especially in tournaments. Across a large enough portfolio, we should take advantage of stacks when they fall to us naturally or require minimal reaching, especially in the early rounds. Every time we reach for a QB to complete a stack, we are likely giving up substantial value, as someone else in the tournament will get the same stack but improved pieces around it. It is also worth considering that if you’re heavy on the early players of a stack and looking to draft their QB, if no one else is trying to complete that stack, there’s an increased likelihood the QB will drop to or past his ADP. There is no hard and fast rule here, but in general, I’m willing to take more risks in tournaments to try and find unique value compared to the field.
As the draft progresses and you get into the later rounds, this is where I would recommend feeling free to reach a round or two. Even the best of us are very bad at predicting who will perform better between a 14th-round and an 18th-round WR. I’d go so far to guess it’s mostly a coin flip. However, while picking between two late players in a vacuum may be close to a coin flip, we can increase our win expectancy by drafting the player who correlates with the rest of our team.
Consider this scenario: You have drafted three Browns, and in the 12th round, you are between drafting Jerry Jeudy and Josh Downs. By projections, we have Downs ranked around 10 spots higher than Jeudy. But given we are already invested and partially dependent upon the Browns having a strong offensive season, now given that new information that the Browns are going to be a strong team, it is a far smarter play to take the correlated WR in Jeudy and hope he’ll thrive just like the rest of the offense. We then also get the additional correlated value of the playoffs where WRs may alternate strong weeks. Amari Cooper may be the necessary piece to advance through the playoffs, but if Jeudy goes off for three TDs in Week 17, he may be rather unique given his lower scores while Cooper carried teams the previous weeks.
In summary: Stacking should be a core part of your strategy, especially later in drafts, but be careful not to reach significantly and give up substantial value.
3. Always Be Thinking Ahead
Before each pick, you should be asking yourself one key question: How does drafting this position now impact my draft strategy going forward? This is because there is an opportunity cost for each pick that must be considered.
If I pass on an RB with both of my first two picks, how am I going to alter my draft strategy to ensure I make up for that lost early RB production? If I am in the ninth round without a QB or TE and I choose to avoid that position again, am I content with drafting three of each position to make up for the lack of quality? Or simply when deciding between two positions, can I project what alternate scenarios I’m passing on as I make my decision?
For that last question, I often like to do a form of 2v2 analysis. In the “2021 Best Ball Kickoff Draft Recap”, I’ve included a conversation between Leone and I where we used a 2v2 analysis to determine if we should select a QB or TE. The technique is to compare your top two players at the two positions being considered and map out what your draft could look like depending upon which one is taken. Granted, one difference in pick can lead to a completely different draft, but to simplify things, we ideally just consider the current pick and a future pick where you would choose the other of the two positions in consideration. In our draft that year, we were between Deshaun Watson and Dallas Goedert (TE-premium scoring) and likely would choose a player from the alternate position the following pick. This left us with the following projected comparisons:
Deshaun Watson + Logan Thomas or Evan Engram
vs
Dallas Goedert + Justin Herbert or Ryan Tannehill
By identifying which players we project will be available at our next pick, we can easily compare which of the two combos we would rather have on our team. While this comparison only had a round of picks in between, it could just as easily be done with a sixth-round pick and 10th-round pick if say we didn’t love the TEs in the next round but wanted to wait on a value.
Every time we are on the clock, we should consider which player best fits my current lineup, but also which player will best fit what my final lineup will become.
4. Playing for Upside
One of the greatest edges we have in DFS and best ball is our ability to understand a range of outcomes and take opportunistic risks where others won’t. This key to success is rooted in that understanding.
In regular leagues, usually, only about 25% of entrants profit, and first place can 6x+ their money. In large tournaments, usually, only about 8% of entrants profit, and first place can 40,000x their money. You can understand why playing for upside is extremely important for tournaments, but it still applies to regular leagues. There is probably a sliding scale and a balance of risk that you can determine based on the type of best ball you’re playing.
Now how do we play for upside?
Don’t be scared of injuries.
Injuries are unfortunate and can destroy an entire best-ball team, but that isn’t a reason to drastically change our drafting strategy. They are often unavoidable, and once we accept that they will inevitably kill some of our teams, the better off we are. If you want to avoid what you believe to be players with increased injury risk, that’s fine. What you don’t want to do is start drafting additional depth in places where you’re concerned you may get an injury.
Say for example you draft Travis Kelce in the third round. You’re concerned they may rest him or he could miss time this year and decide to prioritize drafting a quality backup or two additional TEs as depth. The problem here is you are making a decision based on a situation that if it happens, probably removes you from winning your league anyway; and you’re doing it at the expense of upside. If your third-round draft pick misses substantial time, you’re already significantly behind the eight ball. Grabbing a third TE late or paying up for a quality backup may increase your chances of not finishing last, but it is unlikely to move the needle to still win your league.
For you to win your league, you probably need a very strong year from Kelce, and if that’s the case, you’ve then wasted either a mid-round pick or an additional draft pick on an extra backup TE. This is one of the reasons why I’m a strong proponent of when grabbing an elite TE, only pairing him with one late TE.
Embrace fragility.
When drafting for upside, we are looking to optimize for when things go well — rather than when they go poorly. Just like with injuries, if our first-round TE is a complete dud, it is unlikely that grabbing a third TE in the 16th round would be enough to win us our league. Instead, we should be basing our mid- and late-round draft decisions on the assumption that our early picks are mostly successful. If we invest substantila draft captal in a position early, it behooves us to minimize the additional capital spent on that position. Meaning, if we go with 5 WRs in the first 7 rounds, we probably don’t want to end the draft with more than 7 WRs. Or if we start our draft going RB-RB, we probaby want to wait until the double digit rounds before grabbing any additional RBs. Trusting our early picks to produce and stay healthy allows us to use quantity at other positions to make up for the potential lack of early round quality.
Every pick should have line of sight to a valuable role or spike weeks.
This stance may be a bit controversial, but it’s something I strongly believe in. I don’t allow myself to draft the safe guys with minimal upside. I don’t try to round out my lineup to avoid the potential zeroes. Every pick I make is someone who may find themselves in a valuable role or contributing through occasional spike weeks. This mentality is most relevant in the later rounds of the draft when deciding between roster depth.
For QBs, I don’t want the QBs that have zero rushing upside and a run-first team mentality — just because I know their job is secure. I want Deshaun Watson (ADP 152) over Matthew Stafford (ADP 144).
For RBs, I don’t want the timeshare back on a team that has shown even with injuries, they’re not willing to give one RB a bell-cow role. I usually won’t even be drafting the third-down backs unless they have shown an ability to put up spike weeks. I would rather take the backup RB to a bell cow who is unlikely to see the field early in the season than the RB with a guaranteed third-down role but no line of sight to much more. I want Ty Chandler (ADP 156) over Jerome Ford (ADP 133).
For WRs, I don’t want the WR3 on a bad team that is likely to get five catches for 50 yards a game. If my team needs those 5/50 weeks or even consistently needs those weeks with a touchdown, my team isn’t going to be very good anyway. I would rather draft the WR4 on a high-scoring team and hope he works his way into a starting role or the occasional spike game. I want Jermaine Burton (ADP 207) over Demario Douglas (ADP 171).
For TEs, I don’t want the old, reliable TE that people are drafting because he’s the starter. The role of TEs has shifted in today’s NFL and so should how we draft at this position. The top guys have elite talent with a guaranteed role. Look for guys where the role is ambiguous, but the talent is clear. That is where the value in drafts lies and where the sleeper TEs can be found. I want Dallas Goedert (ADP 108) over Dalton Schultz (ADP 104).
5. When and How To Be Contrarian
This final key to success is specific to large GPP-style tournaments where you must advance out of your initial group to compete against others that have likewise advanced, usually 2-3 times before culminating in the championship round. For standard leagues where you are only competing against the other people in your draft, there is minimal if any value to being contrarian. But for tournaments, this may be the No. 1 opportunity to gain an edge against your opponents during the most valuable weeks.
In DFS, the reason for being contrarian is that when your low-owned player performs well, you have an edge on the field as others don’t also have that low-owned player. On a given week, that may be the pass-catching RB or a third-string WR. But in best ball, drafting a backup RB who you may consider a sleeper isn’t contrarian if he is a common late-round pick in other drafts. The key is finding players that are rarely being drafted at all. That way, if that contrarian player ends up having a big season, not only will he help you win your regular season, but when it comes to the playoffs, you’ll have a unique contrarian player relative to the field.
2023 saw one of the most significant examples, both coming from the Los Angeles Rams: Kyren Williams and Puka Nacua. Kyren was only drafted in 20% of leagues or less than 2% of teams. Puka was drafted in 31% of drafts and on just 2.6% of teams. And even more rare, only 406 teams out of the entire Best Ball Mania IV drafted both Kyren and Puka. That’s one in every 1,668 teams. Not only did people who drafted these guys hit a league winner, increasing their chances of making the playoffs by 2.08x for Kyren drafters and 1.81x for Puka drafters, but once they got to the playoffs, they were far more unique given the overall low draft rate of those players.
Think of being able to enter a DFS tournament knowing the ownership percentages going in. With Best Ball, we have that information, particularly near the end of tournaments. If a player was consistently drafted in the 16th round all year, they are likely to be on 90%+ teams. But if you are able to find players not being drafted that you think have substantial upside, it is that much more valuable to be contrarian and draft those players. At ETR, we’ve even built a tool to help you track player ownership for the BBMV throughout the summer.
I hope this information is helpful. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out on Twitter (@JustinHerzig). And keep an eye out as we’ll be posting a lot more best-ball content throughout the offseason.
